If you really don’t believe the other half of the comment exists…
” Of course whether it’s human caused directly or human caused via 10 degrees of seperation matters little to future generations… but someone, somewhere, needs to actually do the work and provide credible rock solid proof for each and every step along the way.
Otherwise the latter group will keep on growing in size and influence.”
Someone linked you overwhelming evidence, then you asked for "proof". What is wrong with what they linked you? Why don't you believe that people cause climate change directly? What does "10 degrees of separation mean" ?
You were given a link and a synopsis explanation of why there is consensus of climate change being directly man made. What is so unclear that you're claiming it's gibberish?
This seems like you're just writing back what I've written to you, but you still won't say what's wrong with all the evidence on climate change you were given.
” Of course whether it’s human caused directly or human caused via 10 degrees of seperation matters little to future generations… but someone, somewhere, needs to actually do the work and provide credible rock solid proof for each and every step along the way. Otherwise the latter group will keep on growing in size and influence.”