Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But without stackoverflow how do you think the AI will be able to reply about next year's new programming language?


Eventually through experience and self-play with the technologies in question.


LLM can give many answers using absorbed docs and codebase.

Rest still could be asked/answered on SO or github.


What codebase? It wouldn't exist for a new technology. And documentation doesn't have the volume LLMs need


language codebase, they have some tests there for example, using which model can see what are the correct typical implementation details.

> And documentation doesn't have the volume LLMs need

why do you think so? It looks like LLM has some level of few shots generalization.


adding the documentation to the training material and drawing on the vast amount of coding context training it already relies on.


And it's still just going to give me crappy syntax. The number of times I need to tell copilot to PLESE not use Optional[] typing syntax in Python is mind boggling.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: