Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Verification for code is just running it. Maybe "verification" was the wrong word. The model just needs a sense of code X leads to outcome Y for a large number of (high-quality) XY pairs, to learn how to navigate the space better, same as with games.


"just running it" is an enormously absurd simplification


If you can do better please go ahead?


There's an entire field of formal verification that LLMs can take advantage of.

You can incorporate proofs with Coq or Dafny or use model checkers or TLA+ to actually verify your code.

This will be required for any software where correctness matters.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: