They were conflating computational feasibility with sensor device failures.

Ask questions if you don't know, as being rude is not constructive. =3

Quite rich for you to accuse others of being rude. My comparison is apt, borne of your own behavior.

He's kind of entertaining. I usually don't do this here and feel it's normally in bad taste, but he crumbles pretty spectacularly when pushed and I was curious how much material he had for me.

You should see him ascribing nephrotoxicity to a chemical from a mushroom based on the reactions of squirrels in his yard eating an entirely different mushroom. I think I really got him at his peak though just skimming through.

Says the guy that demanded that I cite sources for something someone else said.

You're too funny.

Edit:

The very first one on the now locked comment said he misidentified the mushroom in question.

I'll assume from there you read none of it.

Edit:

Now he edited the post to remove the first cited paper, omg.

Let's do this:

The 4th one is the one you already admitted had bad data.

At least one of the other two clearly states that the mushroom was unidentified. You will have to read or delete both.

You should take a breath and consider why you are so emotionally triggered by criticism of Tesla.

For real man. You are wound up and have left dozens of increasingly irate comments.

This is not emotionally stable behavior. Why are you so heated over criticism of a corporation and by extension a person you don’t even know?

Worth taking a moment for some self reflection, this isn’t healthy.

1. I don't like disinformation 2. I know of this subject +. I might know more of the person than you give credit for too.

Would you consider someone writing and rating Community Notes for a hour or a few hour's sitting once in a while "unhealthy" too? You should steer away from academic institutions. Or Stack Overflow. They'd be joker's asylums for you!