Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I often use the metaphor of LLMs as calculators.

Mathematicians use calculators, and so too do elementary school students, and grocery store clerks, and civil engineers. What each person needs from a calculator can be similar, but would you give a graphing calculator to the store clerk and expect them to be more "productive?"

Admittedly, my metaphor is leaky—and I also can't comment on the participants of the PR—but after reading the comments and the code itself, I'm getting a lot of "here’s a new calculator with a bunch of graphing functions, trigonometric menus, and poem generators—now go do the basic arithmetic you were already doing, but you work for the calculator now" vibes.

Said another way, it took me a lot more time and effort to understand what the bots were saying and if I agreed, than it did for me to formulate my own thoughts and questions.

Like the saying goes, "the best calculator is the one you have with you," and I'd much rather just use my own.



Unfortinately, LLMs arnt deterministic. So they cannot be consistent. So calculators arnt comparable.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: