Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

TBH, I feel like the biggest help Cursor gives me is with understanding large-ish legacy codebases. It's an excellent (& active) "rubber duck". So I'm not sure the argument holds - LLMs don't just write code.


I'm not having the same positive experience on a >25yo insanely large and codebase built with questionable engineering practices


Or is it just giving you a limited understanding but pretending it's grokked the entire codebase AND data?


Yeah I've run several SOTA tools on our gnarly legacy codebase(because I desperately need help), and the results are very disappointing. I think you can only evaluate how well a tool understands a codebase if you already know it well enough to not need it. This makes me hesitant to use it in any situation where I do need it.


But that's already way better than a physical rubber duck. That was my point.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: