> accuracy range of 20% which is a fairly wide window what backs this factoid? | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		utopcell 70 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Continuous Glucose Monitoring > accuracy range of 20% which is a fairly wide window what backs this factoid?

bix6 70 days ago [–]

I’m having a hard time finding a proper comparison table but the top end CGM systems now seem to be around 8% MARD. This study is for BGMS but it shows a range of 2% to 20%: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9445334/

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact