Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Because history treats them as a package deal. Tokugawa Japan saw foreign faces as existential threats. The Ottomans built trust only within ethnic/religious silos (millets). Rome demanded a trinity of assimilation: Latin language, Roman customs, and worship of state gods (later emperor cults).

Today's civic nationalism experiment rejects this link, yet no society has sustained high-trust diversity without such enforced unity. Rome threw everything at assimilation: shared language, values, identity above tribe, and state religion. It still fragmented.

So Western nations face an unprecedented gamble: Can they maintain cohesion without these historical levers? History offers no successful precedents, only warnings.



If Rome, which lasted two thousand years, doesn’t meet your bar, then your bar is too high.


The Roman Empire lasted about two to three centuries in its unified form before it began to seriously fragment.


You still had massive areas under unified control after that.

Two to three centuries is nothing to sneeze at, either. What are you comparing to?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: