Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

A bridge for deer isn't any easier to build than a bridge for pedestrians, even if you don't care about deer being on a bridge that collapses there's a highway underneath. Cars would be crushed and traffic disrupted. So we're just talking about a bridge. It's built to the same standard as any other bridge. (Also it's more like a bridge for mountain lions but whatever.)

If the Empire State Building had been built across a highway, and had to schedule construction around avoiding disruptions to traffic, than it would've taken three years too.






Bridges for pedestrians are far lighter construction than bridges for cars and trucks.

Typical pedestrian bridges aren't 150 feet wide, though. Nor do most have grass growing on them (at least, not intentionally). This is, in fact, a fairly unusual infrastructure project.

I'd imagine that once you're 150 ft wide the potential for several vehicles driving across or parking has to be considered.

Quite possibly. Although I'm not sure that's even significant compared to the increase in weight when it rains, waterlogging the soil on the bridge.

I'd make the bridge bed porous.

Easy to make it impassable for vehicles.

Pedestrians are also far lighter than cars and trucks, and slightly lighter than deers.

Pedestrians also happen to be much denser than cars though, since cars are mostly air, while humans are mostly water, which can lead to some interesting situations (and Wikipedia articles)

My dad worked for a while as an accident investigator for the Air Force. One time there was a crash where a pilot deliberately flew into a cliff at top speed.

The only evidence they ever found of his body was a finger joint. My dad said the body just turns into spray at those speeds.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: