I am reading in a www page (I won't even link it, because of decency):
> The authors[, from the psychology department,] also found that ... dialogues with AI-chatbots helped reduce belief in misinformation [...] «This is the first evidence that non-curated conversations with Generative AI can have positive effects on misinformation»
Some people have their beliefs, but they can change them after discussing with LLMs (of all the ways). Some people are morons - we already knew that.
It surely does not help to suggest the lower decile or the median as representative of the whole.
"People cannot count past ten - see how difficult it is to visualize eleven". If the mudstuck wants to be «honest» with itself, shall he ask around to some """outliers""" in the right side of the curve and be surprised.
I am reading in a www page (I won't even link it, because of decency):
> The authors[, from the psychology department,] also found that ... dialogues with AI-chatbots helped reduce belief in misinformation [...] «This is the first evidence that non-curated conversations with Generative AI can have positive effects on misinformation»
Some people have their beliefs, but they can change them after discussing with LLMs (of all the ways). Some people are morons - we already knew that.