For people using these, is there an advantage to having the agent create PRs and reviewing these versus just iterating with Cursor/Claude Code locally before committing? It seems like additional bureaucracy and process when you could fix the errors sooner and closer to the source.
Ignoring the issue of non-LLM team members, PR's are helpful if you are using GH issues as a memory mechanism, supposedly. That said, I don't bother if I don't have to. I have Claude commit automatically when it feels it made a change, then I curate things before I push (usually just squash).
