> I wouldn’t worry about this project becoming overly mainstream or changing everyday speech.
I disagree - I think the word is already frequently used; the unnecessary use by this project is just another example.
I've no problem with the software or anything like that. Although, I could say that even in the context of the software its a bad name as it is too specific - as you say, it is for intimate toys in general, not specific ones. I also don't think it is going to be valuable for search purposes.
Assuming different people are behind (no pun intended) buttplug.io and this, then I have to give this MCP server credit for choosing the name that’s most valuable for search purposes.
I disagree - I think the word is already frequently used; the unnecessary use by this project is just another example.
I've no problem with the software or anything like that. Although, I could say that even in the context of the software its a bad name as it is too specific - as you say, it is for intimate toys in general, not specific ones. I also don't think it is going to be valuable for search purposes.