With an executive president, sure: but when the president is largely ceremonial and/or a constitutional backstop (much like a constitutional monarch, in fact, except elected), I think the risk is much less.
And it's not like constitutional monarchs are risk-free, either: see, for example, the Shah of Iran in 1953.
And it's not like constitutional monarchs are risk-free, either: see, for example, the Shah of Iran in 1953.