Hate to keep taking issue with your comments, but they are pattently wrong. Using a study of atomic bomb studies and an anti-nuke web site do not constitute science.
Studies Ive read, completely contradict your statements
(http://ehp03.niehs.nih.gov/article/fetchArticle.action?artic...) for one. There are others, and I am sure that I will not be convincing you, but I didn't want your voice to be the only one on the issue here.
The science says otherwise.
http://www.rrjournal.org/doi/pdf/10.1667/RR2629.1
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/04/low-level-doses-of-ra...