And yet, neither the named individual or "The ggml authors" (as stated as the Co... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		Daviey 8 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Ollama violating llama.cpp license for over a year And yet, neither the named individual or "The ggml authors" (as stated as the Copyright holder in llama.cpp/LICENSE) is mentioned here. This "high-5" acknowledgement isn't license compliance.

grodriguez100 8 months ago [–]

Indeed.

It is “nice” but that does not make it compliant.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact