Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Amusingly, about 90% of my rat's-nest problems with Sonnet 3.7 are solved by simply appending a few words to the end of the prompt:

"write minimum code required"

It's not even that sensitive to the wording - "be terse" or "make minimal changes" amount to the same thing - but the resulting code will often be at least 50% shorter than the un-guided version.






Well, the article mentions that this reduces accuracy. Do you hit that problem often then?

The study the article cited is specifically about when asking the LLMs about misinformation. I think on coding tasks and such shorter answers are usually more accurate.

Gemini on the other hand has a tendency for super-defensive coding.

It'll check _EVERY_ edge case separately, even in situations where it will never ever happen and if it does, it's a NOP anyway.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: