Not sure I agree. If you’re going zig->C->obj, you’d still have to fix the zig source if you find an issue in the C level.
If you don’t want to learn or debug in a new language then you should probably just stick with C?
The goal of zig as far as I know is to make it so you can transition away from C completely. Maintaining a C target seems antithetical to breaking ties with the “C machine”.
Yes, as I said I am looking at it exclusively from the point of view of replacing C for new code in existing programs, with a smaller cost than for example adding safe Rust bindings.
If you don’t want to learn or debug in a new language then you should probably just stick with C?
The goal of zig as far as I know is to make it so you can transition away from C completely. Maintaining a C target seems antithetical to breaking ties with the “C machine”.