Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I wouldn't have as much immediate issue with this if Twitter's own clients were acceptable - they are not. And this is an asinine move either way.



Twitter's own clients are fine. You can read tweets and send tweets. That's the basis of the service. It's supposed to be simple. Why don't you like it?


TweetDeck used to do Facebook+Twitter. Will they continue to work on the Facebook part? Unlikely - and there won't be other clients that do both...


The mac client has not been updated since June 2011 ... hardly well supported!


Not really a valid reason. What is it about the client that needs to be updated?


Amusingly, it doesn't even use Twitter's own picture service for photos attachments which is a year old at this point. It still uses yfrog.


I never would have noticed, since it continues to work without any issues for me.


Is that really all there is to it? Are all apps equal provided they have CRUD?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: