Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> They continue to do this thing where they do a huge push into a new technology, then don't see the uptake and let it die.

Except Intel deliberately made AVX 512 a feature exclusively available to Xeon and enterprise processors in future generations. This backward step artificially limits its availability, forcing enterprises to invest in more expensive hardware.

I wonder if Intel has taken a similar approach with Arc GPUs, which lack support for GPU virtualization (SR-IOV). They somewhat added vGPU support to all built-in 12th-14th Gen chips through the i915 driver on Linux. It’s a pleasure to have graphics-acceleration in multiple VMs simultaneously, through the same GPU.



They go out their way to segment their markets, ECC, AVX, Optane support (only specific server class skus). I hate it, I hate as a home pc user, I hate it as an enterprise customer, I hate as a shareholder.


Every company does this. If you're grandma only uses a web browser, word processor, and excel, does she really want to spend an additional $50 on a feature she'll not use? Same with NPUs. Different consumers want different features for different prices.


Except it hinders adoption, because not having a feature in entry-level products will mean less incentive (and ability) for software developers to use it. Compatibility is so valuable it makes everyone converge on the least common denominator, so when you price-gouge on a software-exposed feature, you might as well bury this feature altogether.


Three fallacies and you are OUT!


They've changed that decision. All upcoming cores (even e-cores) will have AVX10 (-512)

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Intel-AVX10-Drops-256-Bit




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: