It’s different because licensed code on github and other websites is different from freely given code snippets on stack overflow.
A blog post is not permission to reproduce code with small changes. Neither is posting it under an open source license which usually require attribution.
That’s funny, I guess everyone just ignores that, but legally it means AI should not be trained on it either since it requires attribution, I wonder was it always that way?
I think AI companies are just trying to ignore IP laws entirely, perhaps they’ll get away with it but there is bound to be a case where a small tool or game is 90% identical to a source reference at some point given the way these LLMs work.