How do you judge? Are you an expert in four different and complex fields? I'm not saying that LLMs are useless anyway, I'm just curious to know how you can judge a report as "undergraduate level".
I sent outputs to experts (friends )in those fields who provided me with some specific topic that is common to their niche. In general their feedback all aligned with: “yeah, this is pretty decent, but anyone who was a professional would know about <some hole in the output>”.
My brain just bleeps out "x-level" as a description of LLM output. It doesn't really make sense and is usually most used by Silicon Valley folk who can't even begin to quantify such definitions with any type of consistency.
