Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is so important to look at, when we talk about this topic. I was there, 3000 years ago, when browser where kind of simple software. We could go back to that state and would loose almost nothing. All the complexity that is now in browsers was in the operating systems at that time. The millions of fronted-devs of today would just be "normal" devs three decades ago. I know, that that will not happen. But it helps looking through all the bullshit that Google has created, where they've build and control the platform (the web with chromium), that Microsoft and Apple used to control (their oses).


FWIW i have a feeling (and it is just a feeling, not something i can confirm) that the entirety of Windows 95 was simpler than Firefox or Chrome today :-P.


This is very likely true.

By LOC: Windows 95 is estimated to have 10-15 million LOC, Chrome 30-40 million.

By binary size: Windows 95 took about 50 MB, Chrome 200-300 MB.

By architecture design: the codebase of Windows 95 is fairly shallow and monolithic, while Chrome is very modular (think V8, Blink, WASM, sandboxes...) and uses other dependencies.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: