Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Paying publishers would most likely cost Meta, which generated $164.5 billion in revenue last year, 62 million Canadian dollars a year, or about $44 million.

What a deceptive sentence. First it quotes worldwide numbers instead of only the Canadian share, and then uses revenue instead of profit.






Why deceptive? It shows how much their revenue was compared to how much they’d have to pay. No judgement, no misleads. Only facts. Anyone who reads can immediately have an idea of their financial strength. How does using profit help as opposed to revenue? And it’s not like FB can only use Canada’s profit to pay for expenses there.

Did you channel your own bias?


> It shows how much their revenue was compared to how much they’d have to pay.

I bought an oil tanker for $100,000,000, and sold it for $100,020,000. My revenue was $100,020,000, so an extra tax of $400,000 should be no problem for me, right?


It's billions in revenue vs millions in extra expense. There's the real deception.

Even their net income was over 60 billions.


Of course. This is written by the New York Times lamenting that meta doesn’t pay them the infinitesimal millions it wants.



Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: