Perhaps the entity at the root of this thread is not a computer? Either way, I don't quite understand how I got involved in this peculiar discussion, and I don't wish to continue it. Enjoy your bits.
1. People usually have distinct characteristics (e.g. eyes, nose mouth arranged in a certain way), so there is rarely confusion as to whether or not something is a person. What has cast your doubt?
2. Nothing, person, computer, or otherwise is upset with Wikipedia in this thread. I suspect that, emphasized by the non-response, nothing has ever been upset with Wikipedia in any time or place. What would there be to be upset about, even if only theoretically?
