Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What would constitute a bad implementation of the idea?

(Also, I don't see anything in the readme that says most people shouldn't use it.)



> Remote CI runners are fantastic for repeatable builds, comprehensive test suites, and parallelized execution. But many apps don't need all that. Maybe yours doesn't either.

My reading of that is that if you need repeatable builds, comprehensive test suites, and/or parallelised execution, then this is not the tool for you.

I think a checkbox, suggested in another comment is a worse implementation.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: