I think you and I must have different definitions of the word "hype".
To me, it means LinkedIn influencers screaming "AGI is coming!", "It's so over", "Programming as a career is dead" etc.
Or implying that LLMs are flawless technology that can and should be used to solve every problem.
To hype something is to provide a dishonest impression of how great it is without ever admitting its weaknesses. That's what I try to avoid doing with LLMs.
"To hype something is to provide a dishonest impression of how great it is" is accurate.
Marketing hype is all about "provide a dishonest impression of how great it is". Putting the weaknesses in fine print doesn't change the hype
Anyways I don't mean to pile on but I agree with some of the other posters here. An awful lot of extremely pro-AI posts that I've noticed have your name on them
I don't think you are as critical of the tech as you think you are.
One of the reasons I do the "pelican riding a bicycle" thing is that it's a great way to deflate the hype around these tools - the supposedly best LLM in the world still draws a pelican that looks like it was done by a five year old! https://simonwillison.net/tags/pelican-riding-a-bicycle/
If you want AI hype there are a thousand places on the internet you can go to get it. I try not to be one of them.
I agree - the content you write about LLMs is informative and realistic, not hyped. I get a lot of value from it, especially because you write mostly as stream of consciousness and explains your approach and/or reasoning. Thank you for doing that.