Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Based on how often they pull in updated bits from FreeBSD (pretty much never), an Apple fork of Linux would be more or less Linux 2.4 today.

I don't know what the loss that open source suffers is in this context?

I don't think Apple would need to spend less time or money on their kernel grafted ontop of Linux 2.4 vs their kernel grafted on top of FreeBSD 4.4




Because presumably the GPL would force them to release their modifications. Apple gets/got away with leeching off the BSDs because of the permissive license.


They release their kernel source more or less timely without the GPL.


A bit off topic, but is there any data or estimates of how often big companies use modified versions GPL software/libraries for their web services without releasing their modifications?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: