They didn't say it was the same. You're arguing with what you imagined they said...

theultdev · 2025-04-04T18:49:15 1743792555

They presented a strawman. I'm unravelling it.

I want to know where their values are and if they contradict.

I'm re-presenting the original scenario being discussed and the scenario they introduced.

Comparing the two while also redirecting back to the original moral dilemma.

anigbrowl · 2025-04-04T19:48:14 1743796094

You're just abstracting it and trying to draw concrete conclusions form abstract cases. Of course it depends on what someone says; to ignore this is asinine.

ziddoap · 2025-04-04T18:51:51 1743792711

Unraveling it by creating your own?

Maybe we can have a strawman party after.

theultdev · 2025-04-04T18:56:40 1743793000

[flagged]

ziddoap · 2025-04-04T19:03:52 1743793432

Right into the ad hominem, fantastic debate tactic. Very dialectic of you.

The irony of saying "maybe you'll figure out how to have a real debate." after a string of personal attacks is *chef's kiss*.

>yet you complain when you get a meta level comment about your behavior.

I'm not complaining. And you're not giving me a "meta level comment about my behavior". You're just attempting to insult me.