Their wishlist is composability, being able to write performant code, being able to perform other low-level operations, being able to use assembly and a reasonably easy build system.
I'd argue that's not just a fairly common list of desired features but that if there's more than 1 of those desires not in your own list then there's probably better languages than Rust to consider.
I'd argue that's not just a fairly common list of desired features but that if there's more than 1 of those desires not in your own list then there's probably better languages than Rust to consider.