Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Conservative Influencers Targeted by 'Swatting' Calls (newsweek.com)
2 points by ivewonyoung 38 days ago | hide | past | favorite | 4 comments



Texas-based talk show host Pagliarulo said he was a victim of swatting in the early hours of March 12.

He played door camera footage on his show showing what he said was an armed law enforcement officer at his door responding to a fake report.

Pagliarulo said he was at first unaware that the armed man was law enforcement and even considered confronting him with his own guns, which he said could have resulted in a "shootout."


[flagged]


FWiW this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43431834

is completely 100% wrong in every point.

I have zero association with the https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=gnabgib account and it was I that flagged your run of 15 or more identical comments that you then deleted.

They showed up as one identical comment after another in https://news.ycombinator.com/newcomments and were clearly [flag] worthy.

If you have any issue with my actions please email dang at the HN email address and ask him to check your comments and my flags.

Addendum:

> The user that submit this post depends on sockpuppets to micromoderate Hacker News on an unofficial basis. This is demonstrated by the fact that any posts calling them out on this are immediately flagged.

Given I am not a sockpuppet of the gnabgib account but am in fact the real life person in Australia that manually flagged your multiple comments .. you may want to revisit your "logic".

Or not. There is no point my debating this with you. Again, I urge you to email the HN moderator and air your suspicions.

> Why are you here?

Long story, began more than 60 years past ... more specifically you falsely accused someone else in regard to action I took (flagging your comments) so I commented to set the record straight.

>> Or not. There is no point my debating this with you.

> I agree.

Obviously I also agree given I made the point.

Please email dang if you have an issue here.

You can annexure all your evidence and make a case that someone is running a bot army to do some manner of bad things. They have the logs and access to raw events, IP's etc.


Unless you are the same person as gnabgib, you can't even know that my comment is wrong. Best-case scenario, you are guessing corollary to your (purported) actions.

I don't believe you, have a nice day.

> Or not. There is no point my debating this with you.

I agree. Why are you here? You haven't even seen my proof yet, you're just claiming that I'm "completely 100% wrong in every point" and refusing to elaborate beyond coincidence.

Occam's razor is not lost on me, but the auspices of online cronyism stick out like a sore thumb. I never called you gnabgib's sockpuppet, either. I said that you lacked the authority to make your claims because you aren't one. Your rhetoric does nothing to elucidate your argument.


Can you please stop posting about this? You've gone way over the line.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: