Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

IMO, it is also unreasonable to have ultra-restrictive rate limits, like blocking a client after one request.

https://rachelbythebay.com/w/atom.xml



I'm with you.

Especially as the cost to serve this content approaches zero.

I find the take in the blog to be relatively hostile. It's a "technically correct" rant. Not wrong, but mostly missing the point, and being a bit of a dick in the process.

Sure - block the readers that make a request every 10 seconds. It's perfectly reasonable to block clients if they hit a limit like 20 to 50 requests in a day.

It's damn hostile to block for 24 hours after a single request. If the 10MB of traffic for 20 requests is going to break the bank... maybe don't host an atom or RSS feed at all?

---

That said - weirdos can weird on their own sites as they like. It's not a public service.

But I bucket this into the same category of weird as posting a whole bunch of threatening "no trespassing", "beware of dog", "homeowner is armed", "Solicitors not welcome", etc style signs all over their property.

Like - point out on the doll where the rss client hurt you. Because something's up.


Maybe a warning after 3 requests and a ban on 4 per 24hr, but I understand the sentiment


haha, true. Just got blocked because I opened the link once and clicked on refresh.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: