I honestly don't understand why this is not the case already. Actually copyright should be even less-enforceable.
Information/access to data/works should be totally free and there should be other ways to support the creators.
For example I could easily download MP3s of music and MP4s of series/movies but I don't: simply because of two reasons:
- I want to support the artist (to an extent as possible)
- Using Spotify/Apple Music/Netflix is much more convenient with a totally acceptable monthly fee.
I know the article is not about entertainment but a library, same rules should apply.
And if one wants to train an LLM, let them: at its essence it's just a person who has read all the books (and access to information should be free), just the person is a machine instead of a biological human being.
> And if one wants to train an LLM, let them: at its essence it's just a person
If I gzip a couple hundred thousand books and distribute them freely, can I also claim it's just a person who has read those books and avoid a massive lawsuit?
None of those services could exist today if copyright didn't exist, because streaming services wouldn't be able to compete with free downloads. I think Patreon and Kickstarter are how creative work is funded in that world.
Piracy isn’t a legal problem—it’s a service problem [1].
Netflix, Spotify, and Valve (Steam) didn’t succeed because of copyright enforcement. They won because they made paying for content easier, faster, and better than piracy.
Piracy isn’t hard, but these services solved the friction: instant access, high quality, fair pricing, and features that free alternatives couldn’t match. That’s why they still thrive today.
If it were legal to download movies and music, Netflix and Spotify would absolutely not exist.
Steam is an unusual case, because games are running software and can't be trivially reproduced in their unencoded form. The publishers can include copy protection, network connection requirements, or even run essential parts of game logic on their own servers. So free downloads became a much worse experience over time.
Netflix might accidentally be the worst possible example you could pick for 'wouldn't exist if piracy were legal.'
Netflix built their entire streaming business model during a time when piracy was so widespread it was almost as good as legal. They succeeded precisely by proving that people would pay for good service even when free options were readily available. They're a textbook example of a business that thrives by being better than free!
Despite huge investments in enforcement, movie piracy never waned. The reason it declined? Netflix. Why is it now seeing a bit of a resurgence? Also Netflix, actually, or rather the fact that people have splintered the streaming landscape.
Here's some articles from Forbes at the time. [1] [2] [3] and an interview with the Netflix CEO [4]
People following the Netflix/piracy story at the time saw it like this: Netflix doesn't necessarily need to care if piracy is legal or not, because it removes most of the incentive to pirate. People tried a lot of things against piracy, until Netflix came along and that was the thing that actually worked. Piracy goes down where Netflix is available. I've also provided enough sources to explain why: Piracy is a service problem [3]. Netflix provides the missing service, so people don't feel like they need to pirate anymore.
In a world where piracy was fully legal, Netflix would still exist, and still drive down piracy. This is Netflix's entire reason for success!
I think you're arguing in good faith, so my response is that I think the legal-piracy world would make it very easy to download things, on par with going to YouTube, something anyone could and would do. I don't think Netflix would be the same in that world. They might well have been the premiere free movie distributors!
We have an internet. It was and is already very easy to download things, legally or not [1] . That's why speculating about legalization making piracy easier misses the point - it's already as easy as it can get.
Netflix just made it that much easier to find what you want[2] and just watch it. People were and are willing to pay for that.
[1] for movies and other large files you can use a torrent tracking site: type what you want, click the result with most seeds, download, play.
[2] Not necessarily as easy as it used to be a few years ago. So piracy is going back up.
Alternative take: those services have a smaller selection, use annoying algorithms to promote IP they own, and are generally worse that piracy, but people don't like being hassled by their ISP and initially they cost a similar amount to a VPN.
Information/access to data/works should be totally free and there should be other ways to support the creators.
For example I could easily download MP3s of music and MP4s of series/movies but I don't: simply because of two reasons:
- I want to support the artist (to an extent as possible) - Using Spotify/Apple Music/Netflix is much more convenient with a totally acceptable monthly fee.
I know the article is not about entertainment but a library, same rules should apply.
And if one wants to train an LLM, let them: at its essence it's just a person who has read all the books (and access to information should be free), just the person is a machine instead of a biological human being.