Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But the future is obvious right? If an AI citizen pays taxes, contributes to society, and has the same rights as humans, why would their creative expression be considered less "real" than a human's? They would be a legitimate member of society expressing themselves through music, just like any other citizen.


>They would be a legitimate member of society.

Damn, you went from pinocchio to real boy is 2 seconds. Your anthropomorphic assumptions will lead to the classification within various species. If you are gonna pay an AI for it's output, but not bees....you may want to re-evaluate your premise.


Woke up today not knowing people even thought AI could be citizens. Wish I could go back to that time


Johnny 5 became a citizen in 1988. You're at least 35 years behind the times. In real life, Saudi Arabia granted a robot citizenship in 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20171110114747/https://cic.org.s...


I mean, that is not anywhere near what we are talking about. It's like those towns that make a dog the mayor to get in the news


it's the same bias this grandfather has: https://youtu.be/KiPQdVC5RHU




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: