Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, that doesn't fit the pattern. The number in the middle can't be repeated.


That’s how it’s excluded, not why we should care about the pattern being exactly that formula.


Sure, you could also look for primes of the form 123…(n-1)n⋅n(n-1)…321.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: