We all do. However, the false premise here is that this data is able to reliably classify drivers into "safe" and "unsafe". If you brake hard, you might save a pedestrian's life. If you don't brake at all, you will kill them. This data lacks context for driver actions to reliably perform that classification. Also, it is also not subject to any kind of appeal where you can bring such other context and facts to bear on the determination if it determines you are "unsafe".
By that logic should we stop having red light and speed cameras? After all, it's not hard to come up with plausible sounding reasons why you might be forced to speed or run a red light.
It is not “by that logic,” since the comment specifically referenced “this data”, meaning inertial and positional telemetry collected by insurers from apps like Gas Buddy, as the article references. Introducing external speed cameras is a strawman.
