Organizations consist of many individuals with different motivations, so it's hard to ascribe a single reason to an individual or group.
Here are some of the real and assumed reasons that companies are pushing for this:
- They have accepted tax breaks or other financial benefits from cities tied to specific headcounts or jobs created
- They are locked into longer term leases or own the building outright and want to make use of their sunk costs
- They found that (on average?) remote employees are less productive
- They want to encourage employees to find another employer
- It's a control/showing-off thing
There seems to be a financial motivation behind this and apparently employee happiness/productivity doesn't appear to be part of it. I [anecdata warning] don't see employers mentioning any sort of commute benefit/subsidy for returning to the office nor do I see 'remote employment' touted as a benefit so these decisions are being made without any consideration for employees.
I guess pick from one of the above and figure out which way a company stands to benefit - there's your answer.
> They have accepted tax breaks or other financial benefits from cities tied to specific headcounts or jobs created
I don't think that's how tax cuts work. No matter the incentives, it's cheaper to not have office space than to have office space and get some write off. I doubt some city is saying "For every $100 of office expenses, we'll give you $200 of tax credits". If anything, companies track days worked from home so they don't have to pay as much city taxes
> They are locked into longer term leases or own the building outright and want to make use of their sunk costs
You can always sublease and many do. There are also variable expenses (insurance, maintenance, etc)
> They found that (on average?) remote employees are less productive
This is my belief
> They want to encourage employees to find another employer
Maybe, as a filtering mechanism. Kind of like soft layoffs, but its very risky.
> It's a control/showing-off thing
Also very risky because you just piss people off and pay to do it.
Here are some of the real and assumed reasons that companies are pushing for this:
- They have accepted tax breaks or other financial benefits from cities tied to specific headcounts or jobs created
- They are locked into longer term leases or own the building outright and want to make use of their sunk costs
- They found that (on average?) remote employees are less productive
- They want to encourage employees to find another employer
- It's a control/showing-off thing
There seems to be a financial motivation behind this and apparently employee happiness/productivity doesn't appear to be part of it. I [anecdata warning] don't see employers mentioning any sort of commute benefit/subsidy for returning to the office nor do I see 'remote employment' touted as a benefit so these decisions are being made without any consideration for employees.
I guess pick from one of the above and figure out which way a company stands to benefit - there's your answer.