Just like last time, and time before that, and the time before that: please stop posting this stuff until there's a solution that actually works at scale. It's like the little brother to cold fusion.
Except worse because plastics are destroying ecosystems and recycling makes people feel better about it despite most recyclable statements being effectively false. Most people have no idea what cold fusion is, and they know even less about why it would be good.
>despite most recyclable statements being effectively false
I keep seeing these sort of statements but have yet to see one backed up by a link to some reputable evidence.
My local supermarket accepts clean soft plastics for recycling and when I investigated I found membership of schemes to ensure full transparency. Looking further I found the companies accepting the waste and financial statements indicating heavy investment in machinery to deal with it.
Plastic recycling, because of what plastics are, is basically impossible at cost. PET recycling might make you think "see, we can recycle plastics" but first and foremost, PET recycling isn't recycling, it's reuse (using the PET as a base material to make something else, like fleece, which cannot be recycled), and second: the majority of plastics aren't PET and literally have no recycling path.
Turns out you can fit a lot of papers in a youtube video when you have a degree in the field and you're doing investigative journalism that you present in a way that people might enjoy watching.
And the final message is definitely a little more nuanced than that =D
