Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> mozilla is a non-profit so doesn't need to respond to market signals.

No? They, just like every other entity, will have to achieve it's investors goals using the least amount of costs possible.

It just happens to be the case that Mozilla's investor's goals aren't more money.

For example, if a non-profit wants to build a bridge to a small island to provide the children of that island access to the mainland's schools; that non-profit would still be very susceptible to market signals regarding the most cost-efficient materials for bridge-building.

It is precisely because of current market signals that this move is a bad move for Mozilla. If GPUs were a dime a dozen and an AI engineer cost a thousand times less to employ than a browser engineer, Mozilla offering an LLM service would be a lot less objectionable than in the current economy.



> No? They, just like every other entity, will have to achieve it's investors goals using the least amount of costs possible.

The Mozilla Foundation is funded by donors not investors. The fiduciary duties of non-profit directors do not have to include using the least amount of costs possible.

The Mozilla Foundation's stated goals are "to advance the vision of the future of the internet and technology".

You might reasonably argue that this means copy catting every other product by slapping AI on itself, but I would counter that this actually demonstrates a lack of vision.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: