Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The publication page of the site seems to contain quite a few publications. What do you mean by no result?


Nothing useful to improving human quality of life.


Exploring unknown paths that turn out not to lead anywhere useful is still worthwhile, since we can't possibly know beforehand what unknown information will or won't be useful. We don't even know what research might become useful based on new information from some other field or line of research.


Great, so there’s no way to “fail” and they can keep asking for money indefinitely. See the problem here? You’d stop shoveling money into research that hadn’t yielded any results either, especially if it was $24 million dollars that could have gone to better avenues.


I thought I had narrow definitions of usefulness.


That was stated as the main goal of the project: improve quality of life in dogs and hope the results transfer to humans. It didn’t achieve that goal so far. I really don’t know what you want me to say.


Being a little facetious: If my dog lives an extra 5 years of high quality life then that would improve my quality of life immeasurably.


?? It's about improving the lifespan of dogs, not humans. But if you must, well, dogs living longer (while healthy) == happier human dog owners.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: