Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not at all. Money represents resources, and it’s objectively better for society for resources to be in the hands of people who are not fools, instead of those who are.


You sound foolish, I’m gonna need to take all your money. Don’t worry, I’m being objective.


The argument is that the objective test is whether you can actually convince anyone to hand over money.


No, they are making a moral argument, and claiming their view is the objectively moral position. It’s “better for society” was the phrase.


We don't need to take money from the fools. They'll give it away.


You can get like minded people and go roleplay feudalism with guns somewhere else, please leave people with empathy out of it.

PS: don't forget to document your inevitable failure, just like every libertarian "non-fools" community previously.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: