Yes. To be honest, when the match was over, I was also left with the feeling that Ding did not capitalize enough on his opportunities. But later after crunching the data I saw that it was actually the other way around.
Sincerely, doesn't this make you question your methodology? It's such an obviously incorrect conclusion that you may as well have concluded that Ding actually won.
I feel like your over-reliance on engine stats like ACPL has led you to some conclusions that may have been true had stockfish been playing leela but really have little or nothing to do with humans playing chess.
