> You may check out Rumble.com as a video player alternative.
Although I'm not familiar with the Rumble player, I assume your advice implies that they'd have to host their videos on Rumble as well. The main issue described in the article is about controlling what gets published on their site and what the user experience is going to be. Hosting their videos on a competitor's service is not the answer to that, as it would simply make them dependent yet on another company.
Media outlets that are large enough to need that kind of control but not large enough to host their own data are in a tough spot there.
Although I'm not familiar with the Rumble player, I assume your advice implies that they'd have to host their videos on Rumble as well. The main issue described in the article is about controlling what gets published on their site and what the user experience is going to be. Hosting their videos on a competitor's service is not the answer to that, as it would simply make them dependent yet on another company.
Media outlets that are large enough to need that kind of control but not large enough to host their own data are in a tough spot there.