Regarding Article 52, paragraph one, there is no proof of fraud. In fact, if I’m not mistaken a vote recount was done and the court accepted the results as valid.
There is an allegation of foreign influence which has not been proven in a court of law.
IMO the court has acted beyond its mandate and only made things worse.
By the way, where is the report from SRI? The internet is full of newspapers which quote it, but don’t link to the original document. From those articles, there is no smoking gun against the candidate themselves. Just some guy which paid people on Tiktok, with no statement on that guy’s connection to the candidate.
We're getting in murky waters about legally debating what constitutes as "proof" to a court that is the sole authority on the constitution and whether they need something to be proven in a different court to act. The vote recount you mention was a different court decision, not connected to this one, which stemmed from a new complaint.
While there is no smoking gun against the candidate, the declassified documents show that intelligence agencies believe a foreign state actor to have been involved in the candidate's TikTok campaign.
There is an allegation of foreign influence which has not been proven in a court of law.
IMO the court has acted beyond its mandate and only made things worse.
By the way, where is the report from SRI? The internet is full of newspapers which quote it, but don’t link to the original document. From those articles, there is no smoking gun against the candidate themselves. Just some guy which paid people on Tiktok, with no statement on that guy’s connection to the candidate.