There should be links to other artciles on BBC, like TicTok admitting the bots farms used, a big one from Ruzzia.
We here in Romania are following this for weeks so we know all this details, hard to find now english links, but imagine some candiate having the guts to declare zero spending in campaign, like how is this possible?
I will try to find the tTic Tok admitting the issue, maybe then the skeptics can accept it or maybe they will claim Romanian gov controls Tc Tok
I mean, even if his campaign finances are declared wrong, it's still shocking that this leads to an election being overturned.
Using my own experience in America, misdeclaring finances (which has been done by Clinton, Trump, Biden, Harris, etc) leads to fines from the FEC, not an election being overturned.
The point with the fraud is to make it clear the guy character, what character or personality trait someone has if the declares ZERO money spent but in fact he spent a lot ? Would such a person accept help from his friends in Kremlin? Would he screw Romanians over ?
Keeping in mind this and the fact Ruzzian troll networks were involved this makes it so our country president would be decided in Kremlin, this is not democratic.
I know in USA you elected a criminal but I would prefer we do not have a criminal and Ruzzian puppet
In a democracy, the people are allowed to elect a criminal into office.
Not allowing that simply allows one administration to weaponize justice to keep their opponents out of office.
This adherence to 'norms' that many democratic states insist on today is the reason why so many of them end up falling to dictatorships and America just keeps chugging along.
> The point with the fraud is to make it clear the guy character, what character or personality trait someone has if the declares ZERO money spent but in fact he spent a lot ? Would such a person accept help from his friends in Kremlin? Would he screw Romanians over ?
Once again, I'll reiterate my point that you seem to be confused as to what democracy is. You're allowed to be a shitty person and to be elected if that's what your country's people want. The time to make these arguments was before the election. And the people to make them to was your fellow countrymen, not random foreigners online. If there was some confusion regarding that, maybe you'll have better luck next time.
>Once again, I'll reiterate my point that you seem to be confused as to what democracy is. You're allowed to be a shitty person and to be elected if that's what your country's people want. The time to make these arguments was before the election. And the people to make them to was your fellow countrymen, not random foreigners online. If there was some confusion regarding that, maybe you'll have better luck next time.
There is no confussion, it is legal to ask the courts to declare an election void because illegal stuff happened like fraud, or the candidate did not followed the electoral laws. It is a shame that the fraud or Ruzzian influence evidence did not appeared before the campaign started but they were clever about this, the guy was less then 1% in oppinions polls and nobody know who he is.
Theadministration does not order the Constitutional Court around and the vote was in unanimity. I suggest you keep an eye on this and what new evidence will appear, sorry that our system does not allow a criminal to be president if he managed to trick some people.
Also probably you are not aware, the presidential elections were in two tours, so the fascist guy gained 25% votes , he did not win 51% votes and the elections were cancelled , the final tour was cancelled because of the interference.
