Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> turned moderately problematic drinking into easily achieved light social drinking.

Is this based on your survey or her self assessment?

> Sitting in a bar for hours on end drinking heavily is simply downright uninteresting

Yet it used to be? You don't find this situation suspect?



> Is this based on your survey or her self assessment?

Both? Being around her, and her self-assessment. Not sure how else one could interpret such a statement. This is all anecdotal evidence and should be taken as such.

> Yet it used to be? You don't find this situation suspect?

Yes, it used to be moderately interesting sometimes with the right people. Suspect in what manner? That it removes the desire to get inebriated? Perhaps so, since we do not understand the mechanism at play. What we don't know can certainly hurt us.

Overall the desire to drink less seems very similar to the impact it has on appetite and hunger levels. In that way, it is not so surprising to me.


FFS. An anecdote is one piece of data, when those pieces of data come together it provides evidence.

For example we see the same behaviors in mice

https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/news-events/research-update/semagl...

>In the current study, the researchers demonstrated that semaglutide reduced binge-like alcohol drinking in both male and female mice, and that the effect was dose-dependent (i.e., greater amounts of semaglutide led to greater reductions in binge alcohol intake). The researchers also tested semaglutide in rats that were made dependent on alcohol through long-term exposure to alcohol vapor. They found that semaglutide reduced alcohol intake in this animal model, again with no sex differences.


> An anecdote is one piece of data

It is not documented, so no, it is not. Which is why I questioned if it was entirely based on self assessment or not and left the door open either way as the question was based out of curiosity and if his anecdote was public I wanted the answer to be as well. Is that not fair?

> when those pieces of data come together it provides evidence.

When you properly document them it literally stops being an anecdote and then becomes evidence.

> The researchers also tested semaglutide in rats that were made dependent on alcohol through long-term exposure to alcohol vapor.

So.. what are we actually measuring then? Isn't alcoholism a disease and not some acquired exposure based dependency? The idea that "GLP-1 for Everything" is even floated in this way is unusual in and of itself. I'm uncomfortable with all this and am once again annoyed at the way we use rats in research.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: