No, it's obvious why Python maintainers would want to drop backward compatibility. What I don't understand is why users would want it. I thought that was pretty clear in my comment; I'm not sure how you managed to misinterpret it to be saying I didn't understand something that's obvious.
At this point you have seriously transgressed the boundaries of civility; having been informed that you had completely misinterpreted my previous comment, the least you could do is to apologize. Instead you are responding with sarcastic remarks apparently predicated on the same misinterpretation you've just been corrected on. You've exhausted the presumption of good faith. Probably even your initial comment was merely trolling; the exaggerated wording full of absolutes and stereotypes should have clued me in.
I know you really, really want me to think that I was owed new Python 2 versions of other people's libraries, but I'm not going to. I've already explained several times that what I think is bad is not people dropping backward compatibility with Python 2, but demonstrating the intent to publicly shame anyone who continued to maintain backward compatibility.
All of your comments are arguing against a position I've never held as if it were my position, well after you have no reasonable excuse for that error. That's dishonest and offensive.
