Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I like to think about this as securing the perimeter. Inside, everything is typed, static analysis constrains what can happen, and I am never surprised as long as the code type checks. Outside, data is probably garbage. All the effort goes into locking down the interface. Pydantic is ok for this, although I find it too intrusive for my taste, and I think mixing arbitrary validity predicates with structural correctness is a mistake. Still, I’d much rather walk into a codebase that uses Pydantic than one that assumes its inputs are valid, because confidently writing business logic that can assume its inputs are correct is incredibly liberating.


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: