Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

An example of a premium domain that confuses me is diy.com. Owned by B&Q. Sure it's a good vanity flex but at the cost of your brand name?

The same brand predicament must be true of whatever prospects milk.com has.



B&Q used to (maybe still do) run lorries up the motorway with the two-line legend: "www.diy.com. Shop online NOW".

Now? I'm literally driving. I'll end up ploughing into the back of your lorry if I shop online now.


It feels like every ad has to end with "NOW!" or "TODAY!". Yes I understand how big research results give the marketing people good reason to insist on it, but it drives me nuts! I do wonder whether its overuse might diminish its supposed effect.


But your passenger is not driving ;)


since they can't have their brand's ampersand in a domain it seems better than the alternative: bandq, which isn't correct either.


Famously, B&Q’s original name was “Block and Quayle” after the surnames of the founders - but they switched to B&Q because everyone in the trade were abbreviating it that way.


interestingly bq.co.uk redirects to diy.com though that doesn't mean they own it


I appreciate that beardsandhats.com redirects to bhphotovideo.com :)


This triggered following a shallow rabbit hole through their history. It's a nice double meaning to incorporate their initials (Blimie & Herman) and heritage in one brand name.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: