The root of the issue seems to be the longstanding deficiency that Texas either cannot or does not localize their emergency alerts at all.
I've lived in 2 other decently large states including California and left Amber Alerts enabled because they were infrequent and caused me no trouble - and they were infrequent because you only got alerts for your immediate area. As soon as I moved to Texas I had to disable them because they're all statewide, so your phone just gets blown up with them if you disable them.
Alerting a 5 mile radius about a killer on the loose is reasonable. A 600+ mile radius is not.
I don't think the issue is really just localization, though, but also timing. The alert went out at 4:50 AM. I think even if it were highly localized, for what is basically a missing persons alert, most people would be pissed and just go back to bed.
Texas definitely can localize their emergency alerts. This alert got sent over the same channel as emergency weather alerts, which get localized per county. It's more that they choose not to localize the alerts.
Even if it was ‘just incompetence’ 95% of the time it would still be irrelevant to the average HN reader, since the remaining 5% would still be too much to ever feasibly track.
As there are tens of thousands of government departments, offices, committees, etc… with some amount of decision making power.
And as there are an exponentially large number of subtle ways the 5% of bad apples could influence the 95%, via a few degrees of separation, that cannot be easily reasoned out.
California had a state-wide Amber Alert once, well over a decade ago. Some department on the fringes of LA sent it, and woke up the whole state, including Northern California, 400 miles away. Millions of people annoyed. Much negative publicity. Didn't happen again. There are still Amber Alerts, but with much shorter ranges.
Hm, that's not my experience with California. I disabled amber alerts pretty quickly because I got them for LA despite being in the north end of the state. I wasn't the only one in my social circle complaining about it, either. This was pretty early into amber alerts showing up on the iPhone. Maybe they've improved since then?
You, too? Fortunately, disabling those doesn't disable the severe weather alerts, and those have worked well for me, most recently in that July tornado.
Yeah I share the same experience in IL, I turned my Amber Alerts off after being woken up by one at around 2am for some incident at the far end of the state 350 miles away. Like you say though, the weather alerts have worked pretty well for me, too.
Similar to your earlier experience, I have only ever gotten alerts that were proximate to my present location, though I do live in a state smaller than Texas.
I probably get about one amber alert per quarter, and severe weather alerts a few times a year. I’ve never gotten a “blue” alert in my life.
I've lived in 2 other decently large states including California and left Amber Alerts enabled because they were infrequent and caused me no trouble - and they were infrequent because you only got alerts for your immediate area. As soon as I moved to Texas I had to disable them because they're all statewide, so your phone just gets blown up with them if you disable them.
Alerting a 5 mile radius about a killer on the loose is reasonable. A 600+ mile radius is not.