Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well, look at it this way: what happened at Fukushima was an ageing, poorly maintained reactor built on a fault line in the Pacific Ring of Fire got hit by a record-setting earthquake AND a tsunami... and despite all of that the damage is not that massive. I mean, yes, the situation is a big mess and I wouldn't want to be in charge of handling the clean up and everything, but let's be fair: considering all of the circumstances it's impressive the damage wasn't way worse.


"Relocation was unjustified for the 160,000 people relocated after Fukushima."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095758201...

So there were and will be no negative health effects from the radiation, whereas 100% of the deaths and other negative effects on people were due to Radiophobia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiophobia


Try to argue for no evacuation when the nuclear power plant is literally melting down and experiencing multiple large explosions.

This feels like post-fact reasoning attempting to in a blasé paper over reality.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haUawwm7l4k


one of their problems was they didn't know what rad levels are to decide how to perform evacuation, because most sensors were shut down bc of tsunami. They were acting blind with no data and were assuming the worst




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: